Re: [Sip] Let's talk about a Dublin agenda

["Dan Wing" <dwing at cisco.com>]

> >> Well, a new working group starts with a BOF request and a draft
> >> charter and somebody who wants the WG badly enough to do the
> >> leg work and chair the BOF.
> >
> > You say that as if nobody tried before.  I requested a BoF for
> > Philadelphia, called Discussion and Analysis of SIP Identity
> > (DASI).  It was turned down by the IESG, and did not have the
> > support of the RAI ADs.
> 
> True, However, the approach you took at that time wasn't clearly  
> coordinated as a handoff of responsibility from the SIP 
> working group. 

True.

> That's what I propose to try now.

Ok.

> We should also consider that much of the proposed work of RUCUS  
> (Reducing Unwanted Communications Using SIP), aka anti-SPIT, 
> depend on strong identity.

Yes, it does.

-d

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip