Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72

[Dean Willis <dean.willis at softarmor.com>]

On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:26 PM, Hisham Khartabil wrote:

> Having looked at the agenda, I think we can do without the 2nd  
> session. What I mean is that we can remove presentations from the  
> 1st session that we don't think need face time (Robert pointed at a  
> couple) and move the ones requiring face time from the 2nd session  
> to the 1st.

Well, I have to say I based the invfix and steps-to-draft times on  
Robert's request from last week, so I'm surprised but not unhappy  
about the suggestion to nuke them.
> I don't think we need 10 mins to bash the agenda.

Keith and I discussed that. I suggested 5. He pointed out that for the  
last 10 meetings or so, every time we've said 5 we've used 15.

> I also don't think we need 10mins for draft-ietf-sip-saml-04. We can  
> limit face time to drafts that have open issues to discuss that were  
> not resolveable on the list.

Here's the open issue with SAML. Are we actually going to do anything  
with it? The two people who seem to care about the draft have worked  
at it steadily. Does it have any meaning to the rest of us? Should we  
publish it? Maybe as experimental?


--
Dean



_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip