[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72


> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Elwell, John
> >
> > 5)    We didn't schedule the clash with DRINKS. We suffer
> > from the problem that there are too many RAI groups, and some
> > of them ask for more time than they need (and some of them
> > get their requests in late!). People propose sets of groups
> > that can meet in parallel, but seem unable to agree on the
> > split.

Nope, not your fault, nor anyone's - and I don't think anyone thinks or claimed it was.  But I think actually that the parallel groups suggested on the RAI mailing list had no dissenters; and regardless, it's really just unfair to make SIP conflict with anything in RAI.  But I'll take this topic to the RAI list.

-hadriel
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip