[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72
On Jul 17, 2008, at 12:05 AM, Dean Willis wrote:
On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:26 PM, Hisham Khartabil wrote:
Having looked at the agenda, I think we can do without the 2nd
session. What I mean is that we can remove presentations from the
1st session that we don't think need face time (Robert pointed at a
couple) and move the ones requiring face time from the 2nd session
to the 1st.
Well, I have to say I based the invfix and steps-to-draft times on
Robert's request from last week, so I'm surprised but not unhappy
about the suggestion to nuke them.
I did not offer to remove steps-to-draft - we do need face time on that.
And I mentioned when I scheduled invfix that we could pull it if there
were no comments before the meeting.
I don't think we need 10 mins to bash the agenda.
Keith and I discussed that. I suggested 5. He pointed out that for
the last 10 meetings or so, every time we've said 5 we've used 15.
I also don't think we need 10mins for draft-ietf-sip-saml-04. We
can limit face time to drafts that have open issues to discuss that
were nFrom sip-bounces at ietf.org Thu Jul 17 08:00:08 2008
Return-Path: <sip-bounces at ietf.org>
X-Original-To: sip-archive at optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-sip-archive at core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196C93A69BD;
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: sip at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip at core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247E13A68A8
for <sip at core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000,
BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id wFykBWtFCOdS for <sip at core3.amsl.com>;
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net
[IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3312F3A6A14
for <sip at ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.3.232] (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121])
(authenticated bits=0)
by nostrum.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m6HExulF084666
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:59:57 -0500 (CDT)
(envelope-from rjsparks at nostrum.com)
Message-Id: <548F439E-18A6-461B-B0CB-141F41E325F9 at nostrum.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks at nostrum.com>
To: Dean Willis <dean.willis at softarmor.com>
In-Reply-To: <F8B12F76-3AC1-4AAD-A702-BBC51650A6E3 at softarmor.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926)
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:59:56 -0500
References: <E22BEE62-CA95-4FAC-839D-A4654950C404 at softarmor.com>
<B70B8EAC-2BC3-446D-AB56-522871BD5B28 at nostrum.com>
<66cd252f0807161626m298f6471g86f9e95d07e87771 at mail.gmail.com>
<F8B12F76-3AC1-4AAD-A702-BBC51650A6E3 at softarmor.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted
mechanism)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/7736/Thu Jul 17 08:11:09 2008 on
shaman.nostrum.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: SIP IETF <sip at ietf.org>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy at cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72
X-BeenThere: sip at ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,
<mailto:sip-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sip at ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request at ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,
<mailto:sip-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: sip-bounces at ietf.org
Errors-To: sip-bounces at ietf.org
On Jul 17, 2008, at 12:05 AM, Dean Willis wrote:
On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:26 PM, Hisham Khartabil wrote:
Having looked at the agenda, I think we can do without the 2nd
session. What I mean is that we can remove presentations from the
1st session that we don't think need face time (Robert pointed at a
couple) and move the ones requiring face time from the 2nd session
to the 1st.
Well, I have to say I based the invfix and steps-to-draft times on
Robert's request from last week, so I'm surprised but not unhappy
about the suggestion to nuke them.
I did not offer to remove steps-to-draft - we do need face time on that.
And I mentioned when I scheduled invfix that we could pull it if there
were no comments before the meeting.
I don't think we need 10 mins to bash the agenda.
Keith and I discussed that. I suggested 5. He pointed out that for
the last 10 meetings or so, every time we've said 5 we've used 15.
I also don't think we need 10mins for draft-ietf-sip-saml-04. We
can limit face time to drafts that have open issues to discuss that
were not resolveable on the list.
Here's the open issue with SAML. Are we actually going to do
anything with it? The two people who seem to care about the draft
have worked at it steadily. Does it have any meaning to the rest of
us? Should we publish it? Maybe as experimental?
--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
ot resolveable on the list.
Here's the open issue with SAML. Are we actually going to do
anything with it? The two people who seem to care about the draft
have worked at it steadily. Does it have any meaning to the rest of
us? Should we publish it? Maybe as experimental?
--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip