[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72
- To: "Tschofenig, Hannes \(NSN - FI/Espoo\)" <hannes.tschofenig at nsn.com>, "ext Robert Sparks" <rjsparks at nostrum.com>, "Dean Willis" <dean.willis at softarmor.com>
- Subject: Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72
- From: "DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)" <drage at alcatel-lucent.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:03:33 +0200
- Cc: SIP IETF <sip at ietf.org>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy at cisco.com>
- Delivered-to: ietfarch-sip-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
- Delivered-to: sip at core3.amsl.com
- In-reply-to: <C41BFCED3C088E40A8510B57B165C1623E215C@FIESEXC007.nsn-intra.net>
- List-help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
- List-id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
- List-post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <E22BEE62-CA95-4FAC-839D-A4654950C404@softarmor.com><B70B8EAC-2BC3-446D-AB56-522871BD5B28@nostrum.com><66cd252f0807161626m298f6471g86f9e95d07e87771@mail.gmail.com><F8B12F76-3AC1-4AAD-A702-BBC51650A6E3@softarmor.com><548F439E-18A6-461B-B0CB-141F41E325F9@nostrum.com> <C41BFCED3C088E40A8510B57B165C1623E215C@FIESEXC007.nsn-intra.net>
- Sender: sip-bounces at ietf.org
- Thread-index: AcjoHe/rddAn1PJWTZ6P31Qkq3VwbAAAr52AAAF34kA=
- Thread-topic: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72
See the response Dean made, but we will come up with a more general post
from the chairs to the SIP list on what we expect to ask here.
Keith
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces at ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:25 PM
> To: ext Robert Sparks; Dean Willis
> Cc: SIP IETF; Cullen Jennings
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72
>
> >>> I also don't think we need 10mins for
> >draft-ietf-sip-saml-04. We can
> >>> limit face time to drafts that have open issues to discuss
> >that were
> >>> not resolveable on the list.
>
> I also do not think we need to discuss the document during
> the meeting.
> There are open issues but they are mostly technical in nature and I
> don't expect a lot of feedback on these issues during a face-to-face
> discussion with a 10 min slot.
>
> My impression at previous SIP meetings was that there is not
> enough time
> for some discussions related to the overall direction of the
> work. Many
> of the detailed discussions on drafts, where often only 5
> folks know the
> subject well enough or care about it enough to join the
> discussion, are
> not really well-spent time given the larger number of folks in the
> meeting room.
>
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
>
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip