[Sip] invfix on 72 agenda (was Re: Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72)

[Dean Willis <dean.willis at softarmor.com>]

On Jul 17, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Robert Sparks wrote:

> On Jul 17, 2008, at 12:05 AM, Dean Willis wrote:
>
> > On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:26 PM, Hisham Khartabil wrote:
> >
> > > Having looked at the agenda, I think we can do without the 2nd  
> > > session. What I mean is that we can remove presentations from the  
> > > 1st session that we don't think need face time (Robert pointed at  
> > > a couple) and move the ones requiring face time from the 2nd  
> > > session to the 1st.
> >
> > Well, I have to say I based the invfix and steps-to-draft times on  
> > Robert's request from last week, so I'm surprised but not unhappy  
> > about the suggestion to nuke them.
>
> I did not offer to remove steps-to-draft - we do need face time on  
> that.
>
> And I mentioned when I scheduled invfix that we could pull it if  
> there were no comments before the meeting.

Okay, that makes sense. The only invfix comments I've seen so far have  
been typographical.

Does anybody have issues of substance to discuss face to face?

---
Dean

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip