[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Sip] saml proposal
On Jul 17, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
If I ignore the ongoing SIP Identity discussions then I could finish
the
document next week.
Would it be reasonable to write the SAML doc against RFC 4474,
documenting the issues with RFC 4474 that you've raised, and then
publish as experimental? Then if we ever get Identity revised, we can
come back to the SAML document. And it gets one more thing off our
plate for now.
And I'd still like to have a SAML tutorial. We've had lunchtime
tutorials on things like XCAP in the past that were well attended. All
we need is a sponsor (asking people to pay for buffet lunch doesn't
work) or a facility that is amenable to "brown bag" lunches in a
conference room. And of course, we need somebody to organize and
present said material . . .
--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
- References:
- [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72
- Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72
- Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72
- Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72
- Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72
- Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72
- From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- [Sip] saml on 72 agenda (Re: Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72)
- Re: [Sip] saml on 72 agenda (Re: Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72)
- From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Sip] saml on 72 agenda (Re: Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72)
- Re: [Sip] saml on 72 agenda (Re: Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72)
- From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)