[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sip] saml proposal
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces at ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Dean Willis
> Sent: 17 July 2008 20:03
> To: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
> Cc: SIP IETF; Cullen Jennings
> Subject: [Sip] saml proposal
>
>
> On Jul 17, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN -
> FI/Espoo) wrote:
>
> >
> > If I ignore the ongoing SIP Identity discussions then I
> could finish
> > the
> > document next week.
> >
>
>
> Would it be reasonable to write the SAML doc against RFC 4474,
> documenting the issues with RFC 4474 that you've raised, and then
> publish as experimental? Then if we ever get Identity
> revised, we can
> come back to the SAML document. And it gets one more thing off our
> plate for now.
[JRE] Sounds reasonable. I know SAML is becoming important in the
applications world and it seems very likely that integration with SIP
will become important sometime in the future. However, I don't see the
drivers at present.
>
> And I'd still like to have a SAML tutorial. We've had lunchtime
> tutorials on things like XCAP in the past that were well
> attended. All
> we need is a sponsor (asking people to pay for buffet lunch doesn't
> work) or a facility that is amenable to "brown bag" lunches in a
> conference room. And of course, we need somebody to organize and
> present said material . . .
[JRE] I would try to attend such a session. One thing I am missing from
the draft is a set of real life use cases - I guess these were in RFC
4484, but something to link the two together would be good, i.e., how
exactly SIP/SAML would operate to solve each of these. Maybe it is just
me, but if you were to explain that in a tutorial it would be helpful.
John
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
- References:
- [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72
- Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72
- Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72
- Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72
- Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72
- Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72
- From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- [Sip] saml on 72 agenda (Re: Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72)
- Re: [Sip] saml on 72 agenda (Re: Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72)
- From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Sip] saml on 72 agenda (Re: Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72)
- Re: [Sip] saml on 72 agenda (Re: Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72)
- From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- [Sip] saml proposal