This is part of why I want people to send in what the three _drafts_ they think are the most important to talk about (I re-emphasize draft here - its different from topics - we know we have some large issues to discuss, but we need to give the editors, and frankly the reviewers, more insight into how much constituency each topic really has at
the moment). On Jul 18, 2008, at 1:03 AM, Dean Willis wrote:
On Jul 16, 2008, at 4:20 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:I do want to talk about 199.But the author Christer said:As I said earlier, I see no major issue with 199 at this point which would require face-to-face discussions. I could give a status update, but that would only take about 5 minutes.So, which is it? Robert, are you aware of any specific issues? Or do you just have general concerns that we aren't getting closure on the list?-- Dean, the agenda mangling cochair
_______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip