Re: [Sip] Thoughts on SIP Identity issues

[Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan at acmepacket.com>]

Cullen,
I think there was some confusion or miscommunication - it was my impression that what you asked for previously was for just *one* use-case/scenario where 4474 doesn't work the way we'd like, so the WG could focus on that one case and decide if it's legitimate to drive for a different mechanism.  I think that's why John presented just one case.  But at the mic it sounded more like you wanted to know *all* scenarios we thought should be handled.

Which is it?

-hadriel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Cullen Jennings
>
> Hmm, I don't think anyone made quite that argument. Personally, I'd
> rather spend time thinking about the problems that were presented
> today in the meeting than repeat previous discussions.
>
> Cullen <with my individual hat on>

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip