[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sip] draft-sparks-sip-invfix-02 (was Re:draft-sparks-sip-invfix-01: comments and questions)

Inline.


On Sep 8, 2008, at 3:05 AM, Kolomaznik Jan wrote:

> OK, but if we want to receive and mask all request retransmissions  
> on transaction layer, this problem is more general. Than we probably  
> need to inform TU about transport error
the next version of the draft (hopefully out later today) will do this.
> , create a new state,
I don't see the need fo rthis

> and stay there enough time to absorb all retransmissions of INVITE  
> request.
The existing Accepted state does this.

>  And this is needed for transport error reaction not only in  
> Accepted state, but also for transport error in Proceeding and  
> Completed states.
Those states already transition to Terminated on transport error - !k�k"��.�Ǭ����t����:�<E�sڶ"��.�Ǭ���:���v�N�"��܆+ޢ�b����ޖ+ޭ�'�}�܆ȩj�!���jk%r��yǢ����۽4�jXh���o'(����c����D�L�p:�z���w�:ӽ4<4����v�N�"��{v��W(�7����\���jk%r��yǢ�����ƥ��-���,�]��[�+{v��W(���a#>'{������r������2��5�t���X��Ĝjy����+������]*Z�YZ�ӗJ��I�{n�J��-�t�jd�j۬6���