Re: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-info-events-00: Content-Type vs Info-Package [was RE: draft-ietf-sip-info-events-00: multiple packages per INFO]

[Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat at cisco.com>]

Christer,

For SDP, you find the part by looking for the one with 
Content-Disposition:session. If there is a part with no C-D header then 
one with a C-T of application/sdp defaults to "session". So its all 
about C-D.

	Paul

Christer Holmberg wrote:
> Hi, 
>
> > I do think there is something we haven't discussed: how do we 
> > figure out what part of the overall body is the part that 
> > carries the package? 
> > Normally this is no issue, since it is the entire body of the 
> > INFO message. But there are cases where it might not be. For 
> > instance if S/MIME is used, or if there is some header in the 
> > message the needs to reference a body part from a CID URI.
> >
> > The answer to this goes back to Content-Disposition. The body 
> > part that contains the info package should have a unique C-D. 
> > That can be "render", or we could pick some other one.
>
> I believe the mime rules are something like:
>
> --boundary
> Mime-headers
> Empy-line
> Content (SDP, info packet, etc)
> --boundary--
>
>
> For SIP, the ruleas are:
>
> SIP-part
> Empty-line
> Message body (SDP, info packet - or one of more mimes).
>
>
> I guess the question is whether we should define some generic syntax for
> the info packages, e.g. Something which identifies the beginning of an
> info package.
>
> For SDP, you find the beginning by looking for the v= parameter.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip