Re: [Sip] SIPit23 Survey Notes

[Robert Sparks <rjsparks at nostrum.com>]

On Oct 24, 2008, at 9:33 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote:

> Hi Robert!
>
> Robert Sparks schrieb:
> > 19% supported SIP over IPSec
>
> What do you mean with "SIP over IPSec"? Every protocol runs over  
> IPSec as it is transparent to the application.
Thomas answered this already.
> > I asked where people were taking bits from messages to display as  
> > caller-id.
> > There were many different kinds of answers, including
> > P-Asserted-Identity if present, then From
> > From display name
> > username part of From uri
> > P-Asserted-Identity only
> > Contact uri
> > Remote IP address
> > P-Asserted-Identity, then Remote-Party-ID, then From
> > From, then Remote-Party-ID, then P-Asserted-Identity
>
> So, if the From header is missing ???, the other headers are used?
Yeah - each row represented an ordered set - if the first thing in the  
row was present, it was used, otherwise, the next thing was looked  
for, and so on...
> thanks for the summary
> Klaus

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip