[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sip] [RFC 4235 & draft-kuthan-sip-derive] 481 "Call doesn't exist" for initial SUBSCRIBE ?

To: sip at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Sip] [RFC 4235 & draft-kuthan-sip-derive] 481 "Call doesn't exist" for initial SUBSCRIBE ?
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc at aliax.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 23:05:19 +0200
Delivered-to: ietfarch-sip-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: sip at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <490382B6.1090400 at cisco.com>
List-help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200810251926.17644.ibc at aliax.net> <490382B6.1090400 at cisco.com>
Sender: sip-bounces at ietf.org
User-agent: KMail/1.9.9

El Sábado, 25 de Octubre de 2008, Paul Kyzivat escribió:
> I agree that 481 seems an unsuitable response in this case.
> Its not clear to me what response is best suited. Perhaps 403 or 603.

I suppose 404 is also unappropiate, isn't?

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Sip] [RFC 4235 & draft-kuthan-sip-derive] 481 "Call doesn't exist" for initial SUBSCRIBE ?
  - From: Dale . Worley

References:
- [Sip] [RFC 4235 & draft-kuthan-sip-derive] 481 "Call doesn't exist" for initial SUBSCRIBE ?
  - From: Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] [RFC 4235 & draft-kuthan-sip-derive] 481 "Call doesn't exist" for initial SUBSCRIBE ?
  - From: Paul Kyzivat

Prev by Date: Re: [Sip] [RFC 4235 & draft-kuthan-sip-derive] 481 "Call doesn't exist" for initial SUBSCRIBE ?
Next by Date: Re: [Sip] draft-kuthan-sip-derive
Previous by thread: Re: [Sip] [RFC 4235 & draft-kuthan-sip-derive] 481 "Call doesn't exist" for initial SUBSCRIBE ?
Next by thread: Re: [Sip] [RFC 4235 & draft-kuthan-sip-derive] 481 "Call doesn't exist" for initial SUBSCRIBE ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread