[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Sip] Draft-ietf-sip-info-events-00: Other messages for Send-Info and Recv-Info
I notice that the current document does define the validity of these
elements for REG, but leaves the section describing the use empty. If
the purpose of inclusion was to somehow register this things in the
registrar against the contact, surely this should be left to feature
tags, as I think has already been suggested on the list. Or was there
some other purpose? If not, I would suggest removal.
The other method that crossed my mind was OPTIONS. Should OPTIONS
provide a mechanism of identifying what the entity at the Request-URI
supports, in the same manner as it does for SDP and option tags, or
should be ignore this possibility on the grounds of simplicity.
Thoughts?
Regards
Keith
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip