[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sip] INFO Events Replacing or Updating INFO?
+1, provided existing use for ISUP and QSIG (Ecma-355) continues to be
valid.
John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces at ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat
> Sent: 24 October 2008 14:58
> To: Eric Burger
> Cc: SIP IETF
> Subject: Re: [Sip] INFO Events Replacing or Updating INFO?
>
>
>
> Eric Burger wrote:
>
> > [X] INFO Events should Obsolete RFC 2976
> > [ ] INFO Events should Update RFC 2796, because ____________
> > [ ] I do not care what you do
>
> But of course the new document must carefully define backward
> compatible
> behavior. Its made a stab at that, and I expect it to be
> complete before
> approval.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
>
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip