[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sip] More on SIP Identity
Hi John,
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Elwell, John <john.elwell at siemens.com> wrote:
> Third, a reminder that there were thoughts expressed in Dublin that we
> should capture in a draft considerations about how a UA should handle
> received identity information. A first attempt at this is in:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-elwell-sip-identity-handling-u
> a-00.txt
Thanks for producing this draft.
Looking at results from the last SIPit [1], Section 3 (UA best
practice for handling received caller identifiers) could represent a
valuable work.
"I asked where people were taking bits from messages to display as caller-id.
There were many different kinds of answers, including
P-Asserted-Identity if present, then From
From display name
username part of From uri
P-Asserted-Identity only
Contact uri
Remote IP address
P-Asserted-Identity, then Remote-Party-ID, then From
From, then Remote-Party-ID, then P-Asserted-Identity
Remote-Party-ID then From
From then P-Assertid-Identity
P-Asserted-Identity, then Reply-To, then From
entire From URI"
Of these, using the From display name occurred most frequently,
but not much more than any of the other responses
[1] https://www.sipit.net/SIPit23_Summary
Cheers,
--
Victor Pascual Ávila
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip