Re: [Sip] Comment on DERIVE and B2BUAs

["Francois Audet" <audet at nortel.com>]

I was more thinking of a nonce as per Dan's draft. But I don't have
a strong opinion.

I am just thinking it's a more appropriate message than the others. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Victor Pascual Ávila [mailto:victor.pascual.avila at gmail.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 17:00
> To: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055)
> Cc: sip at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Comment on DERIVE and B2BUAs
> 
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Francois Audet 
> <audet at nortel.com> wrote:
> > Instead of using a SUBSCRIBE or even INFO, it seems 
> appropriate to use 
> > OPTIONS.
> >
> > By definition, OPTIONS is intended to be routed the same way as an 
> > INVITE, and therefore would be more likly to end-up at the right 
> > place.
> 
> Do you mean including some dialog information in the 
> OPTIONS-request (e.g using the Target-Dialog header)?
> 
> Cheers,
> --
> Victor Pascual Ávila
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip