[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sip] submission of a new I-D: "Dialog Event foR IdentityVErification"
El Viernes, 31 de Octubre de 2008, Victor Pascual Ávila escribió:
> Hi Iñaki,
>
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc at aliax.net> wrote:
> > 2008/10/31 Michael Procter <michael at voip.co.uk>:
> >>> Shall DERIVE be extended to support non-INVITE requests (e.g. MESSAGE)
> >>
> >> I'm not sure it can. RFC4235 is defined for INVITE-initiated dialog
> >> usages only. Yes, it could be extended, but I'm not convinced that is
> >> necessarily the best way forward from here!
> >
> > Also note that MESSAGE doesn't establish a dialog, it just an
> > independent transaction.
>
> Do you mean that we should provide a reasonable assurance that the
> "Caller-ID" is not misleading ONLY for dialog-forming requests?
Well, the problem is that DERIVE wouldn't work for non INVITE dialogs since
RFC 4235 just involve INVITE dialogs.
DERIVE is a good proposal since it reuses existing (and *really* implemented)
features (as Dialog Event Package), but verify�&�*[��Ȟ��6�����^���a�*[��Ȟ����jT�py��r�z�m�k����zX�z��N����"��j�!���jk%r��yǢ����۽4� jXh���o'(����c����D�L������������v�N�"��{v��W(�7����\���jk%r��yǢ�����ƥ��-���,�]��[�+{v��W(���a#>'yӡy��ߗ��r������I�u6��玷���X��Ĝjy����+ ������]*Z�YZ�ӗJ��I�{m��b���J֭����