Re: [Sip] FW: I-D Action:draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-00.txt

[Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan at acmepacket.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>
> I see:
>
>    8. Security Considerations
>
>    There are no specific security issues for this mechanism, beyond
>    those already applicable to SIP-based session signaling. [TBD]
>
> And yet there are significant security considerations.  E.g.:
>
>    The reason for specifying the mechanism, and its length, is to make
>    it impossible to determine the manufacturer of the device which
>    generated it by looking at its format or value.

Quite true - my mistake.

>    9.   IANA Considerations
>
>    This document makes no request of IANA.
>
> > And of course the entire *purpose* of the draft is to define a
> standardized header, which is an IANA consideration.

Yeah Bob pointed that out to me too the second after I submitted it.  D'oh!
Thanks for catching them!

-hadriel
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip