Re: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags

["DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)" <drage at alcatel-lucent.com>]

> Option-tag:
> -----------
> 
> I strongly think we should define an option tag for info packages.

I think you need to provide more than this in terms of explanation. What
interoperability issues do you think is solved by providing an option
tag for the extension itself, as opposed to individual packages?

Give us some valid scenarios.

regards

Keith 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmberg at ericsson.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 1:12 PM
> To: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); Elwell, John; Eric Burger; SIP List
> Subject: RE: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags
> 
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> Feature-tags:
> -------------
> 
> >I agree with John here.
> >
> >I would include an informative reference to RFC 3427 indicating that
> any draft that requires option tags for a package 
> >would need to have the status required for option tag registration.
> 
> One option would have been to define an info feature tag 
> which can list package value, and each package could then 
> specify a value.
> 
> E.g sip.info="dtmf-packkage, isup-package"
> 
> But, I am ok with John's proposal also, but I think we should 
> add some text as suggested by Keith.
> 
> 
> Option-tag:
> -----------
> 
> I strongly think we should define an option tag for info packages.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sip-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces at ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of 
> > Elwell, John
> > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 1:16 AM
> > To: Eric Burger; SIP List
> > Subject: Re: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags
> > 
> > Eric,
> > 
> > If an individual package requires an option tag, that 
> option tag could
> 
> > be defined in the RFC that defines the package, which would 
> need to be
> 
> > standards track. I don't think we need to say anything about this.
> > 
> > Similar situation for media tags, except that RFC would not 
> need to be
> 
> > standards track.
> > 
> > John
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: sip-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces at ietf.org] On
> > Behalf Of
> > > Eric Burger
> > > Sent: 20 November 2008 00:48
> > > To: SIP List
> > > Subject: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags
> > > 
> > > Do we want to specify media tags to indicate package support?
> > > 
> > > Do we want to specify SIP option tags to require Info
> > Package support?
> > > 
> > > Comments welcome.
> > > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
> > sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use 
> > sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
> sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip 
> Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip