Re: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags

["DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)" <drage at alcatel-lucent.com>]

In which case you need an option tag for the info package itself.

Noone is precluding that.

regards

Keith 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dean Willis [mailto:dean.willis at softarmor.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 10:47 PM
> To: Paul Kyzivat
> Cc: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); SIP List; Elwell, John; Christer Holmberg
> Subject: Re: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags
> 
> 
> On Nov 20, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > Dean Willis wrote:
> >
> >> If I don't support info-packages, then I MIGHT support 
> old-info. If I 
> >> do, then I MIGHT understand an INFO (or the legacy set), 
> and I MIGHT 
> >> send you one (from the legacy set). But I'm very, very unlikely to 
> >> understand any of the new CID-indirection-to-select-a- body, 
> >> multiple-body stuff, so don't send it!
> >
> > Dean,
> >
> > You don't need an option tag for this. After the invite, I 
> can't send 
> > you an info package unless you have provided a Recv-Info for it.
> 
> Okay, I'm willing to believe that.
> 
> What if I have an application that really, really requires 
> info- packages, so I want the call to fail if you can't handle them?
> 
> Would this arise, or would it always be preferable to 
> complete the INVITE exchange, then tear the call down once I 
> find out that you don't?
> 
> --
> Dean
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip