Re: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags

[Bob Penfield <BPenfield at acmepacket.com>]

I agree with John. There is no compeling reason to include an option tag. An info-package that actually needs an option tag would need to be defined in a standards track document.

Keep it simple.

Less is more.

cheers,
(-:bob

________________________________________
From: sip-bounces at ietf.org [sip-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Elwell, John [john.elwell at siemens.com]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 8:20 AM
To: Christer Holmberg; DRAGE, Keith (Keith); Dean Willis; Paul Kyzivat
Cc: SIP List
Subject: Re: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags

Christer,

OK, it might be simple, but still unnecessary, so why do it. I haven't
heard a compelling argument in its favour. Per-package option tags are
far more compelling (depending on particular needs of a package),
although I agree such packages would need a standards track document.

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmberg at ericsson.com]
> Sent: 21 November 2008 12:16
> To: Elwell, John; DRAGE, Keith (Keith); Dean Willis; Paul Kyzivat
> Cc: SIP List
> Subject: RE: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags
>
>
> John,
>
> What is "un-simple" by defining an option tag value??? We
> have done that
> many times before...
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elwell, John [mailto:john.elwell at siemens.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 6:46 AM
> To: Christer Holmberg; DRAGE, Keith (Keith); Dean Willis; Paul Kyzivat
> Cc: SIP List
> Subject: RE: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags
>
> Christer,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmberg at ericsson.com]
> > Sent: 20 November 2008 22:53
> > To: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); Dean Willis; Paul Kyzivat
> > Cc: SIP List; Elwell, John
> > Subject: RE: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I still think we shall have an option tag for the extension itself.
> >
> > Eventhough it does not gurantee that the UAS supports specific info
> > packages, at least you can use it to help finding a UAS
> which supports
>
> > the extensions (by using the sip.extensions feature tag).
> [JRE] I haven't heard a compelling argument for this. Keep it simple.
>
> >
> > And, as Dean said, it can be used with OPTIONS.
> [JRE] And I haven't heard a compelling argument for this. Keep it
> simple.
>
> John
>
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip