Re: [Sip] sip-199-02: should it really be *199*?

[Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat at cisco.com>]

Normally when we define new response codes, don't we just let IANA 
assign the next one when the document is finalized? Is this one really 
so special that it *needs* the last provisional code? Any reason this 
shouldn't be 18x? (x=4 unless thats been taken by something in the pipe. 
183 is the last one IANA shows.)

	Thanks,
	Paul
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip