Re: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags

[Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan at acmepacket.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) [mailto:drage at alcatel-lucent.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 6:19 PM
>
> Hadriel wrote:
>
> > That is a different question than "should we have an
> > info-package draft option tag".  I'm fine with providing a
> > way for non-standard uses of Foo to identify their
> > non-standard Foo in Supported.  But I guess that requires an
> > update to 3261?
>
> I think you yourself have admitted that option-tags in Require headers
> are overused (and abused). Therefore I believe if we relax the IANA
> registration requirement for registering new ones, we also need to
> address how we stop people putting them in Require headers when they do
> not need to.

Which is why I carefully put the word "Supported" in my statement: "to identify their non-standard Foo in Supported".  :)

-hadriel
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip