Re: [Sip] INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO

[Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan at acmepacket.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:pkyzivat at cisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 1:36 PM
>
> - *some* error code that can be returned as the response to INFO,
>    which indicates: I didn't like the *content* of the package.
>    If we have a single response that can be used for that, then

Is there some reason you need a different response code than 415 or 400?  Do you think the UAC can take some different automated action due to getting back a 488-type response than a 400, for example?

[I personally hate new response codes - middleboxes always seems to be asked to map them to a different number.]


>    I expect that Reason can be used to refine it.

Unless this has changed, I thought the Reason header was only allowed in requests? (even though I know people put it in responses, and honestly it was silly to only apply it to requests to begin with)

-hadriel
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip