Re: [Sip] INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO

[Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat at cisco.com>]

Dean Willis wrote:
> DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote:
>
> > INFO must carry a response. 
>
> Putting application-level data into an INFO response is problematic as
> this may make the INFO body larger than the transport package size, and
> we have no way to reject large responses.
>
> This is exactly why we stalemated on diagnostic responses.
>
> Given the characteristics of SIP-as-transport, the only reasonable thing
> to do (beside change SIP) is to require all application-layer responses
> use SIP requests in the return direction onstead of piggybacking on the
> SIP response. The SIP response can, in general, tells us only about the
> handling of the request's delivery at a SIP level, not an application level.

Then I guess we had better stop passing SDP in responses.

Why is it that responses can have a body???

	Paul
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip