Re: [Sip] INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO

["Christer Holmberg" <christer.holmberg at ericsson.com>]

Hi,

Please take a look at the "read this first" mail I sent. At least I am
ok with one package per INFO, assuming we remove all the CID stuff from
the draft, and that a single package can have multiple body-parts.

Regards,

Christer 

-----Original Message-----
From: sip-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Hadriel Kaplan
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 6:45 PM
To: Mary Barnes; Eric Burger
Cc: SIP List
Subject: Re: [Sip] INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mary Barnes [mailto:mary.barnes at nortel.com]
> Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 11:34 AM
>
> ... That all said, if there is some correlation/coupling of the two 
> packages by the application, then perhaps you should define a single 
> new package that combines the information - it seems then that the 
> implementation would be significantly simpler.

Right, that's what we said when people asked how to do two things that
really have co-dependence and cannot be separated because they're not
atomic actions.  Just define a package that has both of those things in
it.  A "molecule" so to speak. :)

There's no reason a single package can't have multiple body-parts, for
example.  Just like SUB/NOT/PUB packages can.

-hadriel
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use
sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use
sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip