Re: [Sip] Summary (Was: [Re: Question regarding conflicting grammar for IPV6 SIP URI andRFC 3986])

[Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan at acmepacket.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vijay K. Gurbani [mailto:vkg at alcatel-lucent.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 4:12 PM
>
> Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
> > It's ambiguous with path-rootless, no?
>
> I don't think so.  I don't think you can generate a token with
> "[" and "]" using the path-rootless production rule (unless
> they are escaped.)

Right, but I meant it's ambiguous when it's NOT an IPv6 address.  Which will probably be a lot of the time. :)

Also, I don't really understand what the semantics means for "authority" vs. "path-rootless" in that RFC as defined.  What does an app do differently in those two cases?

-hadriel
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip