[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sip] Summary (Was: [Re: Question regarding conflicting grammar for IPV6 SIP URI andRFC 3986])




On Dec 19, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote:


Presumably we (i.e., the SIP WG) can provide a statement
on why we think that rfc3986 should be changed, and how it
can be changed, but here is a (hopefully small) list of
potential questions and side-effects we don't have an answer
to.

Then have someone in the right authority arbitrate the ABNF
fix.


Personally, I think the URI/v6 problem has a very large scope. I'd be tempted to raise the question on the IETF general list and ask where the work should go.

--
Dean

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip