Re: [Sip] Is this a valid request?

["Rockson Li (zhengyli)" <zhengyli at cisco.com>]

Stephen,

 

This syntax looks correct per RFC3261.

BTW, please post to sip-implementors at lists.cs.columbia.edu for current sip RFC discussion.

 

thanks

 

-Rockson

---

From: sip-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Guo
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 12:40 PM
To: sip at ietf.org
Subject: [Sip] Is this a valid request?

Hi all,
    Please have a look, is 
following request valid?
There is a horizontal tab preceding each 
extra line in To header.

INVITE sip:tester at 192.168.3.104 
SIP/2.0
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Via: 
SIP/2.0/UDP 
192.168.3.101:5068;branch=z9hG4bK68aj5t30nezhwfkv921lsbuiq7coxrdy
From: 
"Negativa" <sip:tester:password at 192.168.3.104:5060>;tag=somefromtagval
Call-ID: 
6tasnymb8du9e2xp045ohz3lwkcr1vfq at TheKlatchianHead
To: 
    
    
    
    
    "Negativa" <sip:tester:password at 192.168.3.104:5060>
Contact: 
<sip:tester:password at 192.168.3.104:5060>
Max-Forwards: 
70
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 389

(SDP not shown)

According RFC 3261 section 
7.3.1 Header Field Format description, "Header fields can be extended over 
multiple lines by preceding each extra line with at least one SP or horizontal 
tab (HT)", above request is valid, 
right? 

-- 
Best Regards,
Stephen
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip