|
Last sentence in 3rd paragraph
in Sec 1: “When SIP entities upstream receive the first 2xx final response, and they do not to intend to accept subsequent 2xx final responses, they will automatically terminate other associated outstanding early dialogs. If additional 2xx final responses are received, for INVITE initiated dialogs those SIPentities will normally send a BYE request using the dialog identifier retrieved from the subsequent2xx final response.”
since the context is 199 and early
dialogs, do we need the reference to INV or can we simplify say : “If additional 2xx final responses are received, they will send a BYE request using the dialog identifier retrieved from the subsequent 2xx final response”
Sec 4.1, last sentence, readability is better
if modified as : “…if a 199 response is
received for that early dialog, client terminates it. Afterwards, client SHOULD
act as before the first early dialog as established Other nits: Sec 1 and 4, decissions -> decisions Sec4, dialogusage -> dialog usage
desribed -> described Sec 4.1example 6, diaogs ->dialogs Sec 4.2, announcement ->
announcement Sec 6, immedialetly > immediately occurred
-> occurred received
-> received
reliably -> reliably prxy ->
proxy Sec 7, compability -> compatibility Thanks, Serhad From:
sip-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg Hi,
Based
on comments and discussions, I've submitted a new version of the 199 draft.
The
currently remaining to-do is to add text to the security chapter.
The
draft can also be found at: http://users.piuha.net/cholmber/drafts/draft-ietf-sip-199-04.txt
Regards,
Christer
|
_______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip