Re: [Sip] New version (-05) of the 199 draft - ready for WGLC?

["Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg at alcatel-lucent.com>]

Dean Willis wrote:
> We didn't get any real answers due to a bit of confusion between this 
> and keepalive. So, let's ask the question again.
>
> Is 199 ready for WGLC?

Yes; it is well written (I had looked at a much earlier version
and just re-read -06.)

One question for Christer:

- Does 199 carry a message/sipfrag MIME type that conveys the
 nature of the final non-2xx response?  This may have been
 discussed in the past, and if so, please let me know.  I
 do note that rfc3420 is specified in the draft as a normative
 reference, but it is not referred to anywhere in the body
 of the draft.

Thanks,

- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg at {alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/