Re: [Sip] Question regarding conflicting grammar for IPV6 SIP URI andRFC 3986

[Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan at acmepacket.com>]

How about: ignorance is bliss?  :)

Seriously, what does RFC 3986 do??  How does it affect anything for common URI formats not to comply with it? (or really, for *it* not to comply with common URI formats)


-hadriel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dale
> Worley
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:10 PM
> To: Dean Willis
> Cc: SIP
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Question regarding conflicting grammar for IPV6 SIP URI
> andRFC 3986
>
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 12:03 -0600, Dean Willis wrote:
> > I'm afraid I have to concur with Theo. 3986 is just broken.
>
> Perhaps so, given that the different URI formats have different sets of
> acceptable characters -- why would that be?
>
> But what is the plan for going forward?
>
> Dale
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip