[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-info-events-03: comments and questions



Bob said:
I'm inclined to say that since the INFO is not suppose to change
dialog state, a 489 response to an INFO should not destroy the INVITE
dialog usage. With SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY its a failure of the dialog
establishing/target-refresh request which is essential to the dialog
usage. But INFO is not essential to the INVITE dialog usage, so
applying the last sentence above makes sense to me.

Doesn't a 489 in any in-dialog Non-Invite-Transaction destroy the dialog usage? It seems like we break the state machine if we make INFO a special case.

--
Dean