Re: [Sip] Terminology (was RE: Fwd: I-DACTION:draft-rosenberg-sip-target-uri-delivery-01.txt

["Elwell, John" <john.elwell at siemens.com>]

(Old messages stripped to prevent blocking)

Hans Erik,
 
The way I interpreted the 01 draft, you would not get the freephone
number anyway. If that is a requirement, then I accept my suggestion
won't suffice.
 
John


________________________________

	From: Hans Erik van Elburg [mailto:ietf.hanserik at gmail.com] 
	Sent: 12 March 2009 12:57
	To: Elwell, John
	Cc: sip at ietf.org
	Subject: Re: [Sip] Terminology (was RE: Fwd:
I-DACTION:draft-rosenberg-sip-target-uri-delivery-01.txt
	
	
	But that does not solve the freephone service use case.
Freephone represents a use case where the R-URI is replaced with an AoR
of user B - not with the contact of user B. 
	
	A calls Bfreephonenumber routed the B (AOR) routed to B's
contact.
	
	The target-uri draft is interested in obtaining:
Bfreephonenumber as that is what A used to reach B.
	
	So what we like to see that B UA receives is something like
	    H-I:  Bfreephone; "istarget",\
	        B,\
	        contact-B
	
	So you want to get Bfreephonenumber and not B.
	
	In certain situations you are also interested in B, I guess that
PBX's would interested in that to deliver to the correct user. We could
distinguish them like:
	    H-I:  Bfreephone; "istarget",\
	        B,"aor"\
	        contact-B
	
	BR,
	/Hans Erik van Elburg