[Sip] comments on draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00.txt

[Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen at cisco.com>]

Few comments.

While this is not a bad idea, its not clear what the point of it is, 
given draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-01.txt suggests anyway a different 
header field for dialog identification through b2bua. Indeed the 
introduction in this document still talks about dialog correlation. Is 
this meant as a way to fix up existing call-id using extensions in a 
backwards compatible way, while session-id is for future things?

I do apologize I did not follow much of the discussion at the end of 
last year if this was discussed then.

-Jonathan R.
--
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                   111 Wood Avenue South
Cisco Fellow                                   Iselin, NJ 08830
Cisco, Voice Technology Group
jdrosen at cisco.com
http://www.jdrosen.net                         PHONE: (408) 902-3084
http://www.cisco.com