[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-199-06
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces at ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Tom Taylor
> Sent: 23 March 2009 12:35
> To: Christer Holmberg
> Cc: SIP WG; Adam Roach
> Subject: Re: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-199-06
>
> Some text , as requested.
>
> Christer Holmberg wrote:
> ...
> >
> >> In section 6:
> >>
> >> When a forking proxy receives a non-2xx final response that it
> >> recognizes as terminating one or more early dialogs, if the proxy
> >> does not intend to forward the final response immediately (in
> >> accordance with rules for a forking proxy) and the UAC
> has indicated
> >> support for the 199 response code, the proxy SHOULD generate and
> > send
> >> a 199 response upstream for each early dialog terminated on the
> >> downstream side by the non-2xx final response, except
> for any early
> >> dialog for which the proxy has previously received and
> forwarded a
> >> 199 response.
> >>
> ...
>
> My suggestion:
>
> "When a forking proxy receives a non-2xx final response that it
> recognizes as terminating one or more early dialogs, it
> SHOULD generate
> and send a 199 response upstream for each such early dialog
> satisfying the
> following conditions:
> -- the proxy does not intend to forward the final response
> immediately
> (in accordance with rules for a forking proxy);
> -- the UAC has indicated support for the 199 response code;
> -- the proxy has not already received and forwarded a 199
> response for
> that early dialogue."
[JRE] Make it clear that all 3 conditions must be true, e.g., by saying
"satisfying all of the following conditions".
John
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
>