Re: [Sip] Comment on draft-roach-sipcore-rfc3265bis-00

[Adam Roach <adam at nostrum.com>]

On 3/23/09 4:25 PM, "Paul Kyzivat" <pkyzivat at cisco.com> wrote:

> I was pretty heavily involved in gruu. It certainly intended to solve a
> problem, but it too ended up much more complex than anybody hoped it
> would - to the point that I suspect there is a lot of reluctance to
> implement it, and a fair amount of potential to implement it wrong.

It definitely spent a lot of its life being quite complicated. But I just
recently re-read the version actually in the queue, and it seems much
simpler and much more implementable than many of the drafts that preceded
it.

/a