Re: [Sip] Comment on draft-roach-sipcore-rfc3265bis-00

[Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan at acmepacket.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Roach [mailto:adam at nostrum.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 12:53 PM
> To: Hadriel Kaplan
>
> And, while I'm flattered that you think that the publication and/or the
> implementation of 3265bis will somehow outrun a document that's
> effectively at the finish line already, I think you are being somewhat
> over-optimistic in your evaluation. By the time 3265bis is an RFC,
> implementations will be further along.

My concern was more that it has nothing to do with implementations - it has to do with use.  I find many new drafts getting early implementation at Sipit's yet not finding them in actual use or even GA code.  Just because we publish an RFC does not mean a heck of a lot as to whether the market will use it.  :(

-hadriel