Re: [Sip] Comment on draft-roach-sipcore-rfc3265bis-00

["Dale Worley" <dworley at nortel.com>]

On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 09:52 -0700, Adam Roach wrote:
> > GRUU is not what one would call a wildly successful mechanism, yet
> 
> Of course it's not. It's not an RFC yet. After the whole multi-year TURN 
> whipsaw experience, I'm stunned anyone bothers to implement anything 
> before it has an RFC number assigned any more. But, suprisingly, they 
> do: more than one in every eight implementations at SIPit 22 implemented 
> GRUU.

I'm not so concerned about getting GRUU implemented.  It's known that
GRUU is necessary to get many call-control mechanisms to work, so
everyone assumes they'll have to implement it eventually.

Dale