Re: [Sip] Securing messages with TEL URI over SIP

[aayush bhatnagar <abhatnagar192006 at gmail.com>]

why not use a sips uri that contains a telephone number instead (in the sense of section 19.1.6, RFC 3261) ?

Eg: sips:+355-554-1234567;postd=pp22 at foo.com;user=phone

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 21:24, Avshalom Houri <AVSHALOM at il.ibm.com> wrote:

I have found discussion thread on how to secure e.g. TEL URI over SIP from 2007.
transport=tls is deprecated and it does not mean end to end anyway.
We still do not have "tels" URI.

Was this discussion concluded and if how it was concluded?

--Avshalom

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip

--
aayush
======
http://www.linkedin.com/in/abhatnagar19