Session Initiation Protocol Discussion Archive - Thread Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index]
[IETF Announcements Archive]
- RE: [Sip] SIPit21: BNF future-proofing problem?, (continued)
- Re: [Sip] SIPit21: BNF future-proofing problem?,
Dale . Worley
- Re: [Sip] SIPit21: BNF future-proofing problem?,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Sip] SIPit21: BNF future-proofing problem?,
Dale . Worley
- VS: [Sip] SIPit21: BNF future-proofing problem?,
Christer Holmberg
- Re: VS: [Sip] SIPit21: BNF future-proofing problem?,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: VS: [Sip] SIPit21: BNF future-proofing problem?,
Thomas Froment
- RE: VS: [Sip] SIPit21: BNF future-proofing problem?,
Christer Holmberg
- Re: VS: [Sip] SIPit21: BNF future-proofing problem?,
Thomas Froment
- RE: VS: [Sip] SIPit21: BNF future-proofing problem?,
Christer Holmberg
- Re: VS: [Sip] SIPit21: BNF future-proofing problem?,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- RE: VS: [Sip] SIPit21: BNF future-proofing problem?,
Christer Holmberg
- RE: VS: [Sip] SIPit21: BNF future-proofing problem?,
T Satyanarayana-A12694
- Re: VS: [Sip] SIPit21: BNF future-proofing problem?,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- [Sip] SIPit 21: Forking Notifys and record-routing mid-dialog requests,
Robert Sparks
- [Sip] SIPit21: SDP in a 200OK when using 100rel,
Robert Sparks
Mail converted by MHonArc