Session Initiation Protocol Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, (continued)
  • Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, SIP SIP
  • Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, SIP SIP
  • RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, George Foti (LMC)
    • RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
  • RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, George Foti (LMC)
    • RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
  • RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Mark Watson
    • RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
      • Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Dean Willis
      • Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
  • RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Mark Watson
    • RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
  • RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Mark Watson
    • RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
      • Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Dean Willis
      • Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
  • RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, George Foti (LMC)
    • RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
  • RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Christian Huitema
  • RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Stephen Terrill (ERA)
    • RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
  • RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Mark Watson
    • RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
  • RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Mark Watson
    • RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
  • RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, James Undery
    • RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
  • RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, James Undery
• [Sip] Manyfolks 05, Gonzalo Camarillo
• RE: [Sip] Path header: Independent operation in each direction, or common o peration for both directions, George Foti (LMC)
• RE: Home Extension Service was Re: [Sip] Multiple 200 OKs for an INVITE, Tom_Gray
  • RE: Home Extension Service was Re: [Sip] Multiple 200 OKs for an INVITE, Henry Sinnreich
• Home Extension Service was Re: [Sip] Multiple 200 OKs for an INVITE, Tom_Gray
  • RE: Home Extension Service was Re: [Sip] Multiple 200 OKs for an INVITE, Alan Johnston
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-rfc2543bis-09.txt,.ps,.pdf, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-srv-06.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-events-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-100rel-06.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-manyfolks-resource-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] [±¤°í]¿©·¯ºÐÀÇ ÀÒ¾î¹ö¸° ÇູÀÇ º¹±îÁö ã¾Æµå¸³´Ï´Ù., ¿î»ê
• [Sip] [±¤°í]¿±±âÀü¹® ¼îÇθô, ¿±±â¼¥
• [Sip] Section 5.2 of manyfolks, Gonzalo Camarillo
• [Sip] RE: NOTIFY behaviour, Adam Roach
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Sip] RE: NOTIFY behaviour, William Marshall
• RE: [Simple] RE: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-events-04; Questions, Adam Roach
• [Sip] NOTIFY behaviour, hisham . khartabil
  • Re: [Sip] NOTIFY behaviour, Bob Penfield
• [Sip] RE: Remote-Party-Id extensibility, Mark Watson
• [Sip] Multiple 200 OKs for an INVITE, Ofir Arkin
  • Re: [Sip] Multiple 200 OKs for an INVITE, Christer Holmberg
  • Re: [Sip] Multiple 200 OKs for an INVITE, Bob Penfield
  • Re: [Sip] Multiple 200 OKs for an INVITE, Prabhas Sinha
  • Re: [Sip] Multiple 200 OKs for an INVITE, Gonzalo Camarillo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Sip] Multiple 200 OKs for an INVITE, Mark Taylor
    • Re: [Sip] Multiple 200 OKs for an INVITE, Bob Penfield
• [Sip] Question regarding event-04, Chen, Xin (Xin)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] Question regarding event-04, Adam Roach
• [Sip] Expires in 2xx response to SUBSCRIBE (Events-04), hisham . khartabil
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] Expires in 2xx response to SUBSCRIBE (Events-04), hisham . khartabil
  • RE: [Sip] Expires in 2xx response to SUBSCRIBE (Events-04), Adam Roach
• RE: [Sip] Irrelevant nit on call-id and IPs, Tan Ya-Ching ICM N PG U ID A 1
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] Irrelevant nit on call-id and IPs, Tan Ya-Ching ICM N PG U ID A 1
• [Sip] Let's discuss a change in the bis. WAS: Why Proxies are Good andB2BUAs May Not Be, thomas . nagel
• [Sip] S/MIME in SIP, Steffen Fries
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] S/MIME in SIP, Peterson, Jon
    • RE: [Sip] S/MIME in SIP, Steffen Fries
    • Re: [Sip] S/MIME in SIP, Jari Arkko
• [Sip] Remote-Party-Id extensibility, Flemming Andreasen
• [Sip] UPDATE Method & Glare, George Foti (LMC)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] UPDATE Method & Glare, Mark Watson
    • Re: [Sip] UPDATE Method & Glare, Jonathan Rosenberg
  • RE: [Sip] UPDATE Method & Glare, George Foti (LMC)
• [Sip] [À̺¥Æ®±¤°í]¹«·á ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ ÇϽøé ÇØ¿Ü ¹«·á ¿©Çà±ÇÀ» µå¸³´Ï´Ù., ¿©Çà°¡ÀÚ
• RE: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-events-04; Questions, Chiou, Mark
• [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, Ofir Arkin
  • Re: [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, Robert Sparks
    • Re: [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, Ofir Arkin
      • Re: [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, Jonathan Rosenberg
      • Re: [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, Gonzalo Camarillo
      • Re: [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, Ofir Arkin
      • Re: [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, Gonzalo Camarillo
      • Re: [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, Ofir Arkin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, hisham . khartabil
  • RE: [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, Tan Ya-Ching ICM N PG U ID A 1
    • Re: [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, Gonzalo Camarillo
    • Re: [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] New Version: draft-ietf-sip-events-04 complete, Adam Roach
• [Sip] Question about section 12.2.2 bis-08, Ofir Arkin
  • Re: [Sip] Question about section 12.2.2 bis-08, Christer Holmberg
• RE: 3GPP Arch. Why use a local proxy? (was Re: [Sip] Path scenari o outside of 3GPP requirements), Mark Watson
  • RE: 3GPP Arch. Why use a local proxy? (was Re: [Sip] Path scenari o outside of 3GPP requirements), jh
    • Re: 3GPP Arch. Why use a local proxy? (was Re: [Sip] Path scenari o outside of 3GPP requirements), Dean Willis
    • Re: 3GPP Arch. Why use a local proxy? (was Re: [Sip] Path scenario outside of 3GPP requirements), Chris Martin
• [Sip] SIP version related statement in bis-08, sshetti
  • Re: [Sip] SIP version related statement in bis-08, Gabor Fenyes
• AW: [Sip] AW: Why Proxies are Good and B2BUAs May Not Be --> NO, thomas . nagel
  • Re: [Sip] AW: Why Proxies are Good and B2BUAs May Not Be --> NO, Dean Willis
  • Re: [Sip] AW: Why Proxies are Good and B2BUAs May Not Be --> NO, Dean Willis
• [Sip] Question on draft-ietf-sip-100rel-05.txt, Christer Holmberg
  • Re: [Sip] Question on draft-ietf-sip-100rel-05.txt, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] Draft -08 comments, part 3: "major" issues, Jonathan Lennox
  • Re: [Sip] Draft -08 comments, part 3: "major" issues, Jonathan Rosenberg
    • Re: [Sip] Draft -08 comments, part 3: "major" issues, Jonathan Lennox
      • Re: [Sip] Draft -08 comments, part 3: "major" issues, Robert Sparks
      • Re: [Sip] Draft -08 comments, part 3: "major" issues, Jonathan Lennox
      • Re: [Sip] Draft -08 comments, part 3: "major" issues, Robert Sparks
      • [Sip] Irrelevant nit on call-id and IPs, Cullen Jennings
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] Draft -08 comments, part 3: "major" issues, James Undery
    • RE: [Sip] Draft -08 comments, part 3: "major" issues, Sean Olson
      • RE: [Sip] Draft -08 comments, part 3: "major" issues, Jonathan Lennox
      • RE: [Sip] Draft -08 comments, part 3: "major" issues, Sean Olson
• [Sip] Draft -08 comments, part 2: clarifications and consistency, Jonathan Lennox
• [Sip] Draft -08 comments, part 1: editorial, Jonathan Lennox
• [Sip] [±¤°í]±¹»êijµå ijµð¾È °¡Á¤¿ë(Çлý¿ë)Ưº°º¸±Þ, Çѱ¹ÀÎÅÚ¸®¸¶ÄÉÆÃ
• Compatibility (was: RE: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body), Mark Watson
• RE: 3GPP Arch. Why use a local proxy? (was Re: [Sip] Path scenario outside of 3GPP requirements), Christian Huitema
  • Re: 3GPP Arch. Why use a local proxy? (was Re: [Sip] Path scenario outside of 3GPP requirements), Dean Willis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: 3GPP Arch. Why use a local proxy? (was Re: [Sip] Path scenario outside of 3GPP requirements), Tom_Gray
  • RE: 3GPP Arch. Why use a local proxy? (was Re: [Sip] Path scenario outside of 3GPP requirements), Christian Huitema
  • RE: 3GPP Arch. Why use a local proxy? (was Re: [Sip] Path scenario outside of 3GPP requirements), Andrew Allen
    • RE: 3GPP Arch. Why use a local proxy? (was Re: [Sip] Path scenario outside of 3GPP requirements), jh
• [Sip] Tone control for an existing dialog, Henry Chen
• [Sip] AW: Why Proxies are Good and B2BUAs May Not Be --> NO NO NO, thomas . nagel
  • Re: [Sip] AW: Why Proxies are Good and B2BUAs May Not Be --> NO NO NO, Dean Willis
• [Sip] UPDATE versus (re)INVITE, Gordon Ledgard
  • Re: [Sip] UPDATE versus (re)INVITE, Gonzalo Camarillo
    • RE: [Sip] UPDATE versus (re)INVITE, Cullen Jennings
      • Re: [Sip] UPDATE versus (re)INVITE, Gonzalo Camarillo
• RE: [Sip] bis-08 11.2 Processing of OPTIONS Request, Sloan, Rob
  • RE: [Sip] bis-08 11.2 Processing of OPTIONS Request, Alan Johnston
• [Sip] 10.3 Processing REGISTER requests, Ofir Arkin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] 10.3 Processing REGISTER requests, hisham . khartabil
• [Sip] Question on Unify draft, Chen, Xin (Xin)
  • Re: [Sip] Question on Unify draft, Gonzalo Camarillo
    • Re: [Sip] Question on Unify draft, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] CANCEL and 100 Trying Question, Fuxbruner, Amihay
  • Re: [Sip] CANCEL and 100 Trying Question, Ofir Arkin
  • Re: [Sip] CANCEL and 100 Trying Question, Robert Sparks
  • Re: [Sip] CANCEL and 100 Trying Question, Gonzalo Camarillo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] CANCEL and 100 Trying Question, hisham . khartabil
• [Sip] Bis-8: merged requests, Christer Holmberg
  • Re: [Sip] Bis-8: merged requests, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: Why Proxies are Good and B2BUAs May Not Be (was Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxiesare not allowed to modify message body), Juan-Carlos . Rojas
  • Re: Why Proxies are Good and B2BUAs May Not Be (was Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body), Dean Willis
    • Re: Why Proxies are Good and B2BUAs May Not Be (was Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body), Pete Cordell
      • Re: Why Proxies are Good and B2BUAs May Not Be (was Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body), Dean Willis
• [Sip] Retry-After delta-seconds NIT in bis08, coreygates
  • Re: [Sip] Retry-After delta-seconds NIT in bis08, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] Manyfolks version 04, Gonzalo Camarillo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] Manyfolks version 04, Tan Ya-Ching ICM N PG U ID A 1
    • Re: [Sip] Manyfolks version 04, Gonzalo Camarillo
  • RE: [Sip] Manyfolks version 04, Chen, Xin (Xin)
    • Re: [Sip] Manyfolks version 04, Gonzalo Camarillo
  • RE: [Sip] Manyfolks version 04, Chen, Xin (Xin)
    • Re: [Sip] Manyfolks version 04, Gonzalo Camarillo
  • RE: [Sip] Manyfolks version 04, Chen, Xin (Xin)
    • RE: [Sip] Manyfolks version 04, jh
    • Re: [Sip] Manyfolks version 04, Gonzalo Camarillo
  • RE: [Sip] Manyfolks version 04, Chen, Xin (Xin)
  • RE: [Sip] Manyfolks version 04, Chen, Xin (Xin)
  • RE: [Sip] Manyfolks version 04, jh
• RE: [Sip] Path scenario outside of 3GPP requirements, Christian Huitema
  • Re: [Sip] Path scenario outside of 3GPP requirements, Dean Willis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] Path scenario outside of 3GPP requirements, Christian Huitema
    • 3GPP Arch. Why use a local proxy? (was Re: [Sip] Path scenario outside of 3GPP requirements), Dean Willis
      • 3GPP Arch. Why use a local proxy? (was Re: [Sip] Path scenario outside of 3GPP requirements), jh
      • Re: 3GPP Arch. Why use a local proxy? (was Re: [Sip] Path scenario outside of 3GPP requirements), Dean Willis
• [Sip] bis08 - telephone-subscriber in rfc2806 and escaped characters, JF Rey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Sip] bis08 - telephone-subscriber in rfc2806 and escaped characters, mgovind
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-camarillo-sip-sigcomp-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] Path header: Independent operation in each direction, or common operation for both directions, Drage, Keith (Keith)
  • [Sip] Path header: Independent operation in each direction, or common operation for both directions, jh
  • RE: [Sip] Path header: Independent operation in each direction, or common o peration for both directions, David R. Oran
• [Sip] T4, hisham . khartabil
  • Re: [Sip] T4, Jonathan Rosenberg
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] T4, hisham . khartabil
    • Re: [Sip] T4, Jonathan Rosenberg
  • RE: [Sip] T4, Fuxbruner, Amihay
    • Re: [Sip] T4, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] sip-request at ietf.org, 조중근
• [Sip] [ÄÚµðÁ¤º¸] "7cm Ä¿Áø Å°"¿Í "Shark ÀðÅ© È÷Ʋ·¯°¡¹æ", Á¤¸» ¸ÚÁ®¿ä! »õÇб⿣ »õ·Î¿î ¸ð½ÀÀ¸·Î.. [±¤°í], ¿¹»ÛÄÚµð
• [Sip] security preconditions, Rohan Mahy
  • Re: [Sip] security preconditions, Jari Arkko
• [Sip] draft-ietf-sipping-cc-framework-00.txt (fwd), Rohan Mahy
• [Sip] (±¤°í)´ºÆ®¸®¼Ç Æ÷ ¶óÀÌÇÁ, ³²°¡Çö
• [Sip] SIP usage in WAP apps, Prabhas Sinha
• [Sip] Interpretation of headers in REGISTER message, Tiruthani, Saravanakumar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] Interpretation of headers in REGISTER message, Adam Roach
• [Sip] Removing security preconditions from manyfolks, Gonzalo Camarillo
  • Re: [Sip] Removing security preconditions from manyfolks, Flemming Andreasen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] Removing security preconditions from manyfolks, Peterson, Jon
    • RE: [Sip] Removing security preconditions from manyfolks, David R. Oran
  • RE: [Sip] Removing security preconditions from manyfolks, Peterson, Jon
• [Sip] Last Call: SIP: Session Initiation Protocol to ProposedStandard, The IESG
• [Sip] Drafts on SIP Telephony Devices, Henry Sinnreich
• RE: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message bod y, Roy, Radhika R, ALASO
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message bod y, George Foti (LMC)
  • RE: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message bod y, Roy, Radhika R, ALASO
    • Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, Jonathan Rosenberg
      • Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, Pete Cordell
  • RE: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message bod y, Mark Watson
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-rfc2543bis-08.txt,.ps,.pdf, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-srv-05.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-100rel-05.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] bis-80 security requirements, Phil Reynolds
  • Re: [Sip] bis-80 security requirements, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] Bis-8: To tag question, Christer Holmberg
  • RE: [Sip] Bis-8: To tag question, Jo Hornsby
    • Re: [Sip] Bis-8: To tag question, Christer Holmberg
      • RE: [Sip] Bis-8: To tag question, Jo Hornsby
      • Re: [Sip] Bis-8: To tag question, Christer Holmberg
      • Re: [Sip] Bis-8: To tag question, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] Q: SIP Encapsulation in XML?, Nagel, Thomas
• [Sip] REGISTER Method: How does proxy interpret the address associations, Venkatasubramanian Tiruthani
• [Sip] bis-08 is born, Jonathan Rosenberg
  • [Sip] Re: [Sip-implementors] bis-08 is born, Paul Kyzivat
    • [Sip] Re: [Sip-implementors] bis-08 is born, Jonathan Rosenberg
      • [Sip] Re: [Sip-implementors] bis-08 is born, Paul Kyzivat
      • Re: [Sip] Re: [Sip-implementors] bis-08 is born, Jonathan Lennox
      • Re: [Sip] Re: [Sip-implementors] bis-08 is born, Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip] bis-07.9: SDP in 1xx responses, Bob Penfield
  • Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: SDP in 1xx responses, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] Decrement Max-Forwards when acting on a 3xx, Rohan Mahy
• [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, Bob Penfield
  • Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, Pete Cordell
    • Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, Christer Holmberg
      • Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, Pete Cordell
      • Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, Christer Holmberg
      • Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, Bob Penfield
      • Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, Pete Cordell
  • RE: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, Cullen Jennings
    • Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, Gonzalo Camarillo
      • Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, Pete Cordell
      • Why Proxies are Good and B2BUAs May Not Be (was Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body), Dean Willis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, George Foti (LMC)
  • RE: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, Adam Roach
    • Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, Pete Cordell
  • RE: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, George Foti (LMC)
  • RE: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, Adam Roach
    • Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, Pete Cordell
  • RE: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, Peterson, Jon
    • Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, Pete Cordell
    • Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, Pete Cordell
• [Sip] 491 Retry-After missing bis 07, Fuxbruner, Amihay
  • Re: [Sip] 491 Retry-After missing bis 07, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] updated offer/answer draft available, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] Bis-7.9: Chapter 17.2.3, Christer Holmberg
  • Re: [Sip] Bis-7.9: Chapter 17.2.3, Christer Holmberg
• [Sip] Small bits on sip-srv, Brazier Lachlan
  • Re: [Sip] Small bits on sip-srv, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] FW: Questions on To tags (was Re: [Sipping] Comments on draft-ietf-sip-rfcbis-05.pdf), Badri Srinivasan S
• [Sip] Questions to draft-undery-sip-auth-00.txt, Steffen Fries
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] Questions to draft-undery-sip-auth-00.txt, James Undery
  • [Sip] Questions to draft-undery-sip-auth-00.txt, Steffen Fries
  • RE: [Sip] Questions to draft-undery-sip-auth-00.txt, James Undery
    • RE: [Sip] Questions to draft-undery-sip-auth-00.txt, Steffen Fries
• [Sip] updated I-D: draft-ietf-sip-100rel-05.txt, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] Different From tags in INVITEs, Badri Srinivasan S
  • Re: [Sip] Different From tags in INVITEs, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] sip-srv update submitted, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] SIP - PSTN Interconnection, Jagannathan R
• [Sip] comments on draft-ietf-sip-rfc2543bis-07.9, Bob Penfield
• [Sip] bis-07.9 "sips:" additions (actually about "SIPS," not S/MIME)., Adam Roach
  • compromising on sips and finishing bis, was: Re: [Sip] bis-07.9 "sips:" additions (actually about "SIPS," not S/MIME)., Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] bis-07.9 nit, Adam Roach
  • Re: [Sip] bis-07.9 nit, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] bis-07.9: q values in Contact headers, William Marshall
• [Sip] 100rel, Jack Lix
  • Re: [Sip] 100rel, Bob Penfield
• [Sip] more SMIME comments, Michael Thomas
  • Re: [Sip] more SMIME comments, Eric Rescorla
  • Re: [Sip] more SMIME comments, Jari Arkko
    • Re: [Sip] more SMIME comments, Michael Thomas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] more SMIME comments, Peterson, Jon
    • RE: [Sip] more SMIME comments, Michael Thomas
• [Sip] SMIME and active MITM attacks, Michael Thomas
  • Re: [Sip] SMIME and active MITM attacks, Eric Rescorla
    • Re: [Sip] SMIME and active MITM attacks, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Sip] SMIME and active MITM attacks, Eric Rescorla
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Sip] SMIME and active MITM attacks, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [Sip] SMIME and active MITM attacks, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Sip] SMIME and active MITM attacks, Juha Heinanen
    • Re: [Sip] SMIME and active MITM attacks, Jari Arkko
      • Re: [Sip] SMIME and active MITM attacks, Michael Thomas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] SMIME and active MITM attacks, Peterson, Jon
    • Re: [Sip] SMIME and active MITM attacks, Ofir Arkin
    • RE: [Sip] SMIME and active MITM attacks, Michael Thomas
• [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-refer-02, Brazier Lachlan
• [Sip] Tables 2&3, George Foti (LMC)
  • RE: [Sip] Tables 2&3, Alan Johnston
• RE: [Sip] Question on Section 16.5 Step 7, George Foti (LMC)
  • Re: [Sip] Question on Section 16.5 Step 7, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] ½Å°³³ä ÈÞ´ëÆù¿ë À̾îÆù -¸¶ÀÌÅ©/À̾îÆù/½ºÀ§Ä¡ ÇѸö¿¡..[±¤°í], ÁÖ
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-events-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] 491 issues, Christer Holmberg
• [Sip] 423 and sip-events-03, Torrey Searle
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] 423 and sip-events-03, Adam Roach
• [Sip] Draft Naming Conventions, Rohan Mahy
• Dialog Tunnelling == bad (Was: [SIP] Event ID), Fairlie-Cuninghame, Robert
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE:Dialog Tunnelling == bad (Was: [SIP] Event ID), Michael Purcell
• [Sip] Two more bis-07.9 BNF nits, Jonathan Lennox
  • Re: [Sip] Two more bis-07.9 BNF nits, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] [Sip]Question on Section 16.5 Section 7, George Foti (LMC)
  • Re: [Sip] [Sip]Question on Section 16.5 Section 7, Robert Sparks
• [Sip] Unify & offers in responses (Question on bis-07), Mark Watson
  • [Sip] Re: Unify & offers in responses (Question on bis-07), Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-events-03.txt available, Adam Roach
• [Sip] Another bis-07.9 BNF nit, Jonathan Lennox
  • Re: [Sip] Another bis-07.9 BNF nit, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] restatement of required ciphers in section 21, Michael Thomas
• [Sip] Remaining uses of <"> in bis-07.9 BNF, Jonathan Lennox
  • Re: [Sip] Remaining uses of <"> in bis-07.9 BNF, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] MINOR comment on bis-7.9, Christer Holmberg
• [Sip] Java based SIP stack, Danillo Marcondes
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Sip] Java based SIP stack, Bobby Sardana
    • Re: [Sip] Java based SIP stack, Henning Schulzrinne
• [Sip] replays and SMIME, Michael Thomas
  • Re: [Sip] replays and SMIME, Eric Rescorla
    • Re: [Sip] replays and SMIME, Henning Schulzrinne
      • Re: [Sip] replays and SMIME, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [Sip] replays and SMIME, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Sip] replays and SMIME, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [Sip] replays and SMIME, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Sip] replays and SMIME, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [Sip] replays and SMIME, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Sip] replays and SMIME, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [Sip] replays and SMIME, Henning Schulzrinne
      • Re: [Sip] replays and SMIME, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Sip] replays and SMIME, Henning Schulzrinne
      • Re: [Sip] replays and SMIME, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Sip] replays and SMIME, Henning Schulzrinne
      • Re: [Sip] replays and SMIME, Michael Thomas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] replays and SMIME, James Undery
    • Re: [Sip] replays and SMIME, Eric Rescorla
  • RE: [Sip] replays and SMIME, James Undery
    • Re: [Sip] replays and SMIME, Jonathan Rosenberg
      • Re: [Sip] replays and SMIME, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Sip] replays and SMIME, Jonathan Rosenberg
      • Re: [Sip] replays and SMIME, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Sip] replays and SMIME, Eric Rescorla
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-update-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] HTML version of Section 22 - Security Considerations (draft-ietf-sip-rfc2543bis-07), Ofir Arkin
• [Sip] Multiple REFER requests in a dialog, Event header ?, Samir Srivastava
  • [Sip] Re: Multiple REFER requests in a dialog, Event header ?, Robert Sparks
• [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-rfc2543bis-07.9 now available, Jonathan Rosenberg
  • Re: [Sip] a couple problems in draft-ietf-sip-rfc2543bis-07.9, Bob Penfield
    • Re: [Sip] a couple problems in draft-ietf-sip-rfc2543bis-07.9, Jonathan Rosenberg
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-rfc2543bis-07.9 now available, Christian Huitema
    • Re: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-rfc2543bis-07.9 now available, Ofir Arkin
      • Re: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-rfc2543bis-07.9 now available, Chris Martin
  • RE: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-rfc2543bis-07.9 now available, Christian Huitema
    • Re: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-rfc2543bis-07.9 now available, Ofir Arkin
• [Sip] Comments on 100rel pre-release, Jo Hornsby
  • [Sip] Re: Comments on 100rel pre-release, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] Comments on SIP SRV Draft, Jo Hornsby
  • [Sip] Re: Comments on SIP SRV Draft, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] RE: Event ID (was RE: Events Last Call.), Fairlie-Cuninghame, Robert
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Sip] RE: Event ID (was RE: Events Last Call.), Adam Roach
  • [Sip] RE: Event ID (was RE: Events Last Call.), Fairlie-Cuninghame, Robert
    • Re: [Sip] RE: Event ID (was RE: Events Last Call.), Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] RE: Warnings headers in requests., Adam Roach
• [Sip] comments on UPDATE, Rohan Mahy
• [Sip] Note: minor change in transaction ID, Jonathan Rosenberg
  • RE: [Sip] Note: minor change in transaction ID, Jo Hornsby
• [Sip] comments on 100rel, Rohan Mahy
  • Re: [Sip] comments on 100rel, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] Event ID (was RE: Events Last Call.), Adam Roach
  • Re: [Sip] Event ID (was RE: Events Last Call.), Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] comments on srv draft, Rohan Mahy
  • Re: [Sip] comments on srv draft, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] Bis-7: Question on brackets, Christer Holmberg
  • Re: [Sip] Bis-7: Question on brackets, Robert Sparks
    • Re: [Sip] Bis-7: Question on brackets, Christer Holmberg
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] Bis-7: Question on brackets, Adam Roach
• AW: AW: [Sip] CSeq question?, Brazier Lachlan
• [Sip] SIP-TLS Travesty (another perspective), Danyuu Wuu
  • Re: [Sip] SIP-TLS Travesty (another perspective), Jonathan Rosenberg
  • Re: [Sip] SIP-TLS Travesty (another perspective), Eric Rescorla
  • Re: [Sip] SIP-TLS Travesty (another perspective), Dean Willis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] SIP-TLS Travesty (another perspective), Christian Huitema
    • Re: [Sip] SIP-TLS Travesty (another perspective), Chris Martin
      • Re: [Sip] SIP-TLS Travesty (another perspective), Chris Martin
• [Sip] Final bis-07 nits, John Hearty
  • Re: [Sip] Final bis-07 nits, Robert Sparks
  • Re: [Sip] Final bis-07 nits, Robert Sparks
• [Sip] Warnings headers in requests., Fairlie-Cuninghame, Robert
• [Sip] [광고] sip님 가구공장에서 특별할인가로 고급생활가구를 보내드립니다., VIVI KOREA
• [Sip] a compromise on S/MIME, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] multicast restricted to ttl=1, Jonathan Rosenberg
  • RE: [Sip] multicast restricted to ttl=1, David R. Oran
    • Re: [Sip] multicast restricted to ttl=1, Jonathan Rosenberg
      • RE: [Sip] multicast restricted to ttl=1, David R. Oran
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] multicast restricted to ttl=1, Roy, Radhika R, ALASO
• AW: [Sip] CSeq question?, Brazier Lachlan
  • Re: AW: [Sip] CSeq question?, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] yet more bis-07 nits, Rohan Mahy
  • Re: [Sip] yet more bis-07 nits, Robert Sparks
• [Sip] re: SMIME in SIP, Rohan Mahy
  • Re: [Sip] re: SMIME in SIP, Ofir Arkin
  • [Sip] re: SMIME in SIP, Michael Thomas
    • Re: [Sip] re: SMIME in SIP, Allison Mankin
      • Re: [Sip] re: SMIME in SIP, Michael Thomas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Sip] re: SMIME in SIP, Rohan Mahy
  • RE: [Sip] re: SMIME in SIP, Christian Huitema
    • RE: [Sip] re: SMIME in SIP, Michael Thomas
  • RE: [Sip] re: SMIME in SIP, Christian Huitema
• [Sip] Re: [Sip-implementors] Comments on bis-06, Robert Sparks
  • [Sip] Re: [Sip-implementors] Comments on bis-06, Gonzalo Camarillo
• [Sip] pre-release of 100rel available, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Rohan Mahy
  • [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Michael Thomas
    • Re: [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Ofir Arkin
      • Re: [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Ofir Arkin
      • Re: [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Ofir Arkin
      • Trust the Client? Sortof (Re: [Sip] SMIME in SIP), Dean Willis
      • Re: Trust the Client? Sortof (Re: [Sip] SMIME in SIP), Eric Rescorla
      • Re: Trust the Client? Sortof (Re: [Sip] SMIME in SIP), Ofir Arkin
      • Re: Trust the Client? Sortof (Re: [Sip] SMIME in SIP), Eric Rescorla
      • Re: Trust the Client? Sortof (Re: [Sip] SMIME in SIP), Dean Willis
      • Re: [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Chris Martin
    • Re: [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Chris Martin
      • Re: [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Chris Martin
      • Re: [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Chris Martin
      • Re: [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Jonathan Rosenberg
      • Re: [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Chris Martin
      • Re: [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Chris Martin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Christian Huitema
    • RE: [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Michael Thomas
      • RE: [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Juha Heinanen
    • Re: [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Ofir Arkin
  • RE: [Sip] SMIME in SIP, Peterson, Jon
• [Sip] UPDATE draft now available, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] nits/comments on bis-07, Rohan Mahy
  • Re: [Sip] nits/comments on bis-07, Robert Sparks
    • Re: [Sip] nits/comments on bis-07, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] Help, Alp Eren YILMAZ
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Sip] help, sushma . boppana
    • Re: [Sip] help, Tom-PT Taylor
• [Sip] A Problem with Section 22.3.2.1 (bis-07), Ofir Arkin
• [Sip] {±¤ °í} ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ°¡°ÝÁ¤º¸ ¸ÞÀϸµ ȸ¿øÀÌ µÇ¼¼¿ä (^-^)~, ÄÄÁ¤º¸
• [Sip] Change of Editor for draft-ietf-sip-manyfolks-resource, Dean Willis
• [Sip] [±¤°í]»õ·Î¿î »ç¾÷À̳ª ºÎ¾÷À» ãÀ¸½Ê´Ï±î?, ¸¶ÄÉÅÍ
• [Sip] A few more bis-07 nits, John . Hearty
  • Re: [Sip] A few more bis-07 nits, Robert Sparks
• [Sip] Clarification on overlapping transaction in bis07, Sanjoy Sen
  • Re: [Sip] Clarification on overlapping transaction in bis07, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] use of TCP in bis07, Sanjoy Sen
  • Re: [Sip] use of TCP in bis07, Jonathan Rosenberg
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] use of TCP in bis07, Sanjoy Sen
    • RE: [Sip] use of TCP in bis07, Juha Heinanen
• [Sip] Query: Adopt draft-willis-sip-path-xx as WG doc?, Dean Willis
  • Re: [Sip] Query: Adopt draft-willis-sip-path-xx as WG doc?, Jonathan Rosenberg
  • Re: [Sip] Query: Adopt draft-willis-sip-path-xx as WG doc?, Miguel A. Garcia
    • Re: [Sip] Query: Adopt draft-willis-sip-path-xx as WG doc?, Juha Heinanen
      • Re: [Sip] Query: Adopt draft-willis-sip-path-xx as WG doc?, Dean Willis
      • Re: [Sip] Query: Adopt draft-willis-sip-path-xx as WG doc?, Juha Heinanen
      • Re: [Sip] Query: Adopt draft-willis-sip-path-xx as WG doc?, Miguel A. Garcia
      • Re: [Sip] Query: Adopt draft-willis-sip-path-xx as WG doc?, Juha Heinanen
    • Re: [Sip] Query: Adopt draft-willis-sip-path-xx as WG doc?, Dean Willis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] Query: Adopt draft-willis-sip-path-xx as WG doc?, Drage, Keith (Keith)
    • RE: [Sip] Query: Adopt draft-willis-sip-path-xx as WG doc?, jh
  • RE: [Sip] Query: Adopt draft-willis-sip-path-xx as WG doc?, bernhard . honeisen
    • RE: [Sip] Query: Adopt draft-willis-sip-path-xx as WG doc?, jh
      • [Sip] Path scenario outside of 3GPP requirements, Dean Willis
  • RE: [Sip] Query: Adopt draft-willis-sip-path-xx as WG doc?, bernhard . honeisen
    • RE: [Sip] Query: Adopt draft-willis-sip-path-xx as WG doc?, jh
• [Sip] Reminder: SIP Events WGLC Ending Soon!, Adam Roach
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Sip] Reminder: SIP Events WGLC Ending Soon!, Schulz, Eric
  • RE: [Sip] Reminder: SIP Events WGLC Ending Soon!, Adam Roach
  • RE: [Sip] Reminder: SIP Events WGLC Ending Soon!, Fairlie-Cuninghame, Robert
  • RE: [Sip] Reminder: SIP Events WGLC Ending Soon!, James Undery
  • RE: [Sip] Reminder: SIP Events WGLC Ending Soon!, Adam Roach
  • RE: [Sip] Reminder: SIP Events WGLC Ending Soon!, Fairlie-Cuninghame, Robert
  • RE: [Sip] Reminder: SIP Events WGLC Ending Soon!, Adam Roach
  • RE: [Sip] Reminder: SIP Events WGLC Ending Soon!, Adam Roach
  • RE: [Sip] Reminder: SIP Events WGLC Ending Soon!, Fairlie-Cuninghame, Robert
  • RE: [Sip] Reminder: SIP Events WGLC Ending Soon!, Adam Roach
  • RE: [Sip] Reminder: SIP Events WGLC Ending Soon!, Fairlie-Cuninghame, Robert
  • RE: [Sip] Reminder: SIP Events WGLC Ending Soon!, James Undery
  • RE: [Sip] Reminder: SIP Events WGLC Ending Soon!, James Undery
  • RE: [Sip] Reminder: SIP Events WGLC Ending Soon!, Adam Roach
  • RE: [Sip] Reminder: SIP Events WGLC Ending Soon!, Adam Roach
  • RE: [Sip] Reminder: SIP Events WGLC Ending Soon!, James Undery
• [Sip] Review of section 22 "Security Considerations" of draft-ietf-sip-rfc2543bis-07, Ofir Arkin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] Review of section 22 "Security Considerations" of draft-ietf-sip-rfc2543bis-07, Peterson, Jon
  • [Sip] Review of Section 22 "Security Considerations" of draft-ietf-sip-rfc2543bis-07, Ofir Arkin
• [Sip] Comments on section 23 Common Message Components and section 24 Header Fields in bis-07, Hisham Khartabil
  • Re: [Sip] Comments on section 23 Common Message Components and section 24 Header Fields in bis-07, Robert Sparks
• [Sip] Very minor nits on section 22 Security Considerations in bis-07, Hisham Khartabil
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] Very minor nits on section 22 Security Considerations in bis-07, Peterson, Jon
• [Sip] Some Loose Routing feedback, bernhard . honeisen
  • Re: [Sip] Some Loose Routing feedback, Robert Sparks
    • RE: [Sip] Some Loose Routing feedback, Jack W. Lix
• [Sip] Comments on section 21 S/MINE in bis-07, Hisham Khartabil