Hi Rohan,
Hi Aki,
I read your SIP calendaring draft. I think this is a very good idea and very well written, especially for a -00 draft.
Thanks.
However, I don't think there is anything new here from a SIP perspective. I think this work is firmly out of scope and would be much more suited to the calsify or caldav WGs.
To underscore this, all of the open issues relate to calendaring domain expertise (ex: subscription filters to select what parts of the calendar are "interesting"). I think your draft is in a similar position as my location package whose main issues deal with location (which I submitted with a geopriv prefix).
Agree.
I would like to see this work continue. While in Paris, please speak with the calendaring chairs and see if they are willing to host this work.
That's the idea.
Cheers, Aki
minor note: I think 1 day is fine for the default subscription
thanks, -rohan
_______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sip at ietf.org for new developments of core SIP