[Sipping] Re: SIP Calendaring Events doc

[Rohan Mahy <rohan at ekabal.com>]

On Jul 26, 2005, at 20:52, Aki Niemi wrote:

> Hi Rohan,
>
> ext Rohan Mahy wrote:
> > Hi Aki,
> > I read your SIP calendaring draft.  I think this is a very good idea 
> > and very well written, especially for a -00 draft.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > However, I don't think there is anything new here from a SIP 
> > perspective.  I think this work is firmly out of scope and would be 
> > much more suited to the calsify or caldav WGs.
>
> This work _definitely_ needs calendaring folks' attention. However, it 
> does fall into sipping's domain of expertise, since it defines two new 
> event packages. And as far as I understand the SIP change process, 
> they have to go through SIPPING.

According to the SIP Change Process, a SIP Event Packages can be 
defined in any IETF Working Group.  (Recall that SIMPLE defined the 
presence event package).

thx,
-r


> > To underscore this, all of the open issues relate to calendaring 
> > domain expertise (ex: subscription filters to select what parts of 
> > the calendar are "interesting").  I think your draft is in a similar 
> > position as my location package whose main issues deal with location 
> > (which I submitted with a geopriv prefix).
>
> Agree.
>
> > I would like to see this work continue.  While in Paris, please speak 
> > with the calendaring chairs and see if they are willing to host this 
> > work.
>
> That's the idea.
>
> Cheers,
> Aki
>
> > minor note: I think 1 day is fine for the default subscription
> > thanks,
> > -rohan


_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sip at ietf.org for new developments of core SIP