[Sipping] Fwd: [Fwd: WGLC of draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-10.txt]

Hi,

Following are the review comments for sections 2.7, 2.8 and 2.9 (sections assigned to me) of draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-10.txt.

Regards

Nagesh

=====

2.7

F3 - Here proxy sends 181 when it is forwarding the call. However, proxy shall not generate any response by itself as per RFC 3261 - P110.

"Since a proxy may not insert a tag into the To header field of a 1xx response to a request that did not contain one, it cannot issue

non-100 provisional responses on its own. "

F4 - the t= line in the forwardede SDP shall be identical to what is received. ( 0 is missing).

F13 - the 1st Via header bracnch parameter shall be identical to what is sent in F12. (Currently, "1" is missing in the end for the latter.)

2.8

F6 - Here proxy sends 181 when it is forwarding the call. However, proxy shall not generate any response by itself as per RFC 3261 - P110.

"Since a proxy may not insert a tag into the To header field of a 1xx response to a request that did not contain one, it cannot issue

non-100 provisional responses on its own. "

2.9

F10 - Here proxy sends 181 when it is forwarding the call. However, proxy shall not generate any response by itself as per RFC 3261 - P110.

"Since a proxy may not insert a tag into the To header field of a 1xx response to a request that did not contain one, it cannot issue

non-100 provisional responses on its own. "

F7 - To tag in the CANCEL shall be the same as that of 180 Ringing in F5.

F15 - the via branch of this message shall match with the second Via header's branch parameter in F14.

General

All the other message call-flows have Allow header included in INVITEs and responses. This shall be repeated for sections 2.7, 2.8 and 2.9 too.

On 6/4/06, Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo at ericsson.com > wrote:

Hi,

all of you in the 'To' field of this email have volunteered to review
the service examples draft. Thanks a lot for agreeing to perform this
review.

This is how we would like to divide the work: in the list below, I have
assigned a few sections to each of the reviewers. When you are done with
your review, send it in a reply-to-all to the email below, which was the
WGLC for this draft on the SIPPING mailing list. We would like to have
all the reviews ready by the end of the WGLC, on July 1st.

< vkg at lucent.com>
     2.1.  Call Hold
     2.2.  Consultation Hold

<john.elwell at siemens.com >
     2.3.  Music On Hold
     2.18. Automatic Redial
     2.19. Click to Dial

< joel.repiquet at tech-invite.com>
     2.4.  Transfer - Unattended
     2.5.  Transfer - Attended
     2.6.  Transfer - Instant Messaging

< bvnkumar at gmail.com>
     2.7.  Call Forwarding Unconditional
     2.8.  Call Forwarding - Busy
     2.9.  Call Forwarding - No Answer

< ravipati at avaya.com>
     2.10. 3-way Conference - Third Party is Added
     2.11. 3-way Conference - Third Party Joins

< eburger at cantata.com>
     2.12. Single Line Extension

<jbemmel at zonnet.nl >
     2.13 . Find-Me

<Miguel.An.Garcia at nokia.com>
     2.14. Call Management (Incoming Call Screening)
     2.15. Call Management (Outgoing Call Screening)

<dworley at pingtel.com>
     2.16. Call Park
     2.17. Call Pickup

Thanks,

Gonzalo

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: WGLC  of draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-10.txt
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:37:40 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo < Gonzalo.Camarillo at ericsson.com>
To: sipping < sipping at ietf.org>
CC: Samuli Pöykkö <samuli.poykko at hut.fi>,  Mary Barnes
< mary.barnes at nortel.com >, Alan Johnston <alan at sipstation.com>, Robert
Sparks < RjS at estacado.net>,  kevin.summers at sonusnet.com

Folks,

we would like to working group last call (WGLC) the following draft:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-10.txt

as you have probably noticed if you clicked on the link above, this is a
very long draft. Therefore, we would like to get at least ten volunteers
to review it. We will assign a couple of sections to each reviewer.

If you are interested and willing to review this draft, please send an
email to the SIPPING chairs.

The email below should be considered as a WGLC comment:

http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipping/current/msg10886.html

This is the output of the idnits tool:

idnits 1.96

tmp/draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-10.txt:

  Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html:

    Checking conformance with RFC 3978/3979 boilerplate...

    the boilerplate looks good.

  * There is 1 instance of too long lines in the document, the longest one
    being 1 character in excess of 72.

  Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt:
    Nothing found here (but these checks do not cover all of
    1id-guidelines.txt yet).

  Miscellaneous warnings:
  - Line 1028 has weird spacing: '... /* Bob  place...'
  - Line 1404 has weird spacing: '... /* Bob  takes...'
  - Line 1732 has weird spacing: '... /* Bob  place...'
  - Line 2459 has weird spacing: '...and Bob  have ...'
  - Line 2597 has weird spacing: '... /* Bob  puts ...'
  - (4 more instances...)

  Experimental warnings:
  - Unused Reference: [18] is defined on line 7860, but not referenced
  - Unused Reference: [13] is defined on line 7839, but not referenced
  - Unused Reference: [14] is defined on line 7842, but not referenced
  - Unused Reference: [1] is defined on line 7795, but not referenced

This WGLC will end on July 1st, 2006 (a long draft needs a long WGLC).

Thanks,

Gonzalo
SIPPING co-chair