[Sipping] Re: [Fwd: WGLC of draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-10.txt]

2.10 and 2.11 look fine to me.

Thanks,

-Chandra.

From: Joel Repiquet [mailto:joel.repiquet at tech-invite.com]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 6:41 AM
To: Gonzalo Camarillo
Cc: vkg at lucent.com; john.elwell at siemens.com; joel.repiquet at tech-invite.com; bvnkumar at gmail.com; Ravipati, Chandra (Chandra); dworley at pingtel.com; jbemmel at zonnet.nl; eburger at cantata.com; Miguel.An.Garcia at nokia.com; Mary Barnes; Alan Johnston; Robert Sparks; kevin.summers at prodeasystems.com; Cullen Jennings; Jon Peterson
Subject: Re: [Fwd: WGLC of draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-10.txt]

Hi,
It is OK to me regarding examples 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6 related to Transfer.
BR
Joel

On Sam Mar 3 13:46 , Gonzalo Camarillo sent:

Dear reviewers of the service examples draft,

the authors have submitted yet another revision of the draft that is
supposed to address your last set of comments on revision 11. As in
previous occasions, could you please have a look at it and send a note
to the SIPPING mailing list, cc:ing the chairs, stating whether or not
you are now OK with the draft?

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-12.txt

For your convenience, your reviews are stored at:

http://www.softarmor.com/sipping/process/wg-review/sipping-rt-wglc.html

The diff between revisions 11 and 12 is available at:

http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sipping/draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples/draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-12-from-11.diff.html

Thanks,

Gonzalo

Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> Dear reviewers of the service examples draft,
>
> the authors of the draft have submitted a new revision of the draft that
> is supposed to address all your WGLC comments. Could you please have a
> look at it and send a note to the SIPPING mailing list, cc:ing the
> chairs, stating whether or not you are now OK with the draft?
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-11.txt
>
>
> For your convenience, your reviews are stored at:
> http://www.softarmor.com/sipping/process/wg-review/sipping-rt-wglc.html
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gonzalo
>
> Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> all of you in the 'To' field of this email have volunteered to review
>> the service examples draft. Thanks a lot for agreeing to perform this
>> review.
>>
>> This is how we would like to divide the work: in the list below, I have
>> assigned a few sections to each of the reviewers. When you are done with
>> your review, send it in a reply-to-all to the email below, which was the
>> WGLC for this draft on the SIPPING mailing list. We would like to have
>> all the reviews ready by the end of the WGLC, on July 1st.
>>
>>
>> <vkg at lucent.com>
>> 2.1. Call Hold
>> 2.2. Consultation Hold
>>
>> <john.elwell at siemens.com>
>> 2.3. Music On Hold
>> 2.18. Automatic Redial
>> 2.19. Click to Dial
>>
>> <joel.repiquet at tech-invite.com>
>> 2.4. Transfer - Unattended
>> 2.5. Transfer - Attended
>> 2.6. Transfer - Instant Messaging
>>
>> <bvnkumar at gmail.com>
>> 2.7. Call Forwarding Unconditional
>> 2.8. Call Forwarding - Busy
>> 2.9. Call Forwarding - No Answer
>>
>> <ravipati at avaya.com>
>> 2.10. 3-way Conference - Third Party is Added
>> 2.11. 3-way Conference - Third Party Joins
>>
>> <eburger at cantata.com>
>> 2.12. Single Line Extension
>>
>> <jbemmel at zonnet.nl>
>> 2.13. Find-Me
>>
>> <Miguel.An.Garcia at nokia.com>
>> 2.14. Call Management (Incoming Call Screening)
>> 2.15. Call Management (Outgoing Call Screening)
>>
>> <dworley at pingtel.com>
>> 2.16. Call Park
>> 2.17. Call Pickup
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: WGLC of draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-10.txt
>> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:37:40 +0300
>> From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo at ericsson.com>
>> To: sipping <sipping at ietf.org>
>> CC: Samuli Pöykkö <samuli.poykko at hut.fi>, Mary Barnes
>> <mary.barnes at nortel.com>, Alan Johnston <alan at sipstation.com>, Robert
>> Sparks <RjS at estacado.net>, kevin.summers at sonusnet.com
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> we would like to working group last call (WGLC) the following draft:
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-10.txt
>>
>>
>> as you have probably noticed if you clicked on the link above, this is a
>> very long draft. Therefore, we would like to get at least ten volunteers
>> to review it. We will assign a couple of sections to each reviewer.
>>
>> If you are interested and willing to review this draft, please send an
>> email to the SIPPING chairs.
>>
>> The email below should be considered as a WGLC comment:
>>
>> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipping/current/msg10886.html
>>
>> This is the output of the idnits tool:
>>
>> idnits 1.96
>>
>> tmp/draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-10.txt:
>>
>>
>> Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html:
>>
>> Checking conformance with RFC 3978/3979 boilerplate...
>>
>> the boilerplate looks good.
>>
>> * There is 1 instance of too long lines in the document, the longest
>> one
>> being 1 character in excess of 72.
>>
>> Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt:
>> Nothing found here (but these checks do not cover all of
>> 1id-guidelines.txt yet).
>>
>> Miscellaneous warnings:
>> - Line 1028 has weird spacing: '... /* Bob place...'
>> - Line 1404 has weird spacing: '... /* Bob takes...'
>> - Line 1732 has weird spacing: '... /* Bob place...'
>> - Line 2459 has weird spacing: '...and Bob have ...'
>> - Line 2597 has weird spacing: '... /* Bob puts ...'
>> - (4 more instances...)
>>
>> Experimental warnings:
>> - Unused Reference: [18] is defined on line 7860, but not referenced
>> - Unused Reference: [13] is defined on line 7839, but not referenced
>> - Unused Reference: [14] is defined on line 7842, but not referenced
>> - Unused Reference: [1] is defined on line 7795, but not referenced
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This WGLC will end on July 1st, 2006 (a long draft needs a long WGLC).
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Gonzalo
>> SIPPING co-chair
>>
>>
>>
>
>