[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Sipping] 433 error response format.



Hi
 
If the privacy type indicated is "id", then the From header should contain "anonymous". But since in your case the From header contains a valid name, then I think there is something wrong in the request that is sent to the UA.
 
But a 433 is more applicable to server., not sure of how a UA should behave( as per draft-ietf-sip-acr-code-04.txt). But I think UA could throw a 433 since it will not be able to fulfill the anonymity requirement of calling UA.
 
Regards
Ranjit
 


From: Preethi.Sadasivan at aricent.com [mailto:Preethi.Sadasivan at aricent.com]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 12:25 PM
To: adi
Cc: sipping at ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Sipping] 433 error response format.





   What should be the behavior of an UserAgent when it receives a valid From header
but the Privacy header contains the value "id"/"user". Can the UA throw 433 just with this
check.

Preethi.



"adi" <adi at personeta.com>

04/29/2007 03:44 PM

To
<Dale.Worley at comcast.net>, <sipping at ietf.org>
cc
Subject
RE: [Sipping] 433 error response format.





UAS don't need to instruct UAC on retry since the decision on retry is user
dependent and the reason to send 433 is because the UAC don't have a way to
handle the case (announcements to dial #82 and the number for example to
allow normal call without hiding caller information).
In some cases of international call the UAC can't identify treatment to the
caller.

Adi

-----Original Message-----
From: Dale.Worley at comcast.net [mailto:Dale.Worley at comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 12:27 AM
To: sipping at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Sipping] 433 error response format.

  From: Preethi.Sadasivan at aricent.com

     A UAC receiving a 433 (Anonymity Disallowed) MUST NOT retry the
     [...]

  How will the UAS indicate the UAC that it has a desire for the
  request to be retried. Will this be communicated in some headers
  like that of Retry-Header.

The UAS has no input into the decision by the UAC to retry the request
(without anonymity).

Dale


_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sip at ietf.org for new developments of core SIP



_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sip at ietf.org for new developments of core SIP



***********************  Aricent-Private   ***********************
"DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be 
circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received this message in error, 
please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly
prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for 
loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage from virus."
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sip at ietf.org for new developments of core SIP