RE: [Sipping] I-D on service identification now available

["Samir Srivastava" <samirsr at nortel.com>]

>
>The problem now is that every access-side operator would have 
>to understand every possible service-side offering. The only 
>way to do that is to reduce the set of potential services to a 
>least-common denominator that is contractually agreed between 
>the service providers. This is the death of service innovation 
>in the Internet, and something I believe we must say "NO" to.
>
>Further, it's why I think the SIP-level signaling should be 
>opaque to the access network provider. It's none of their 
>business, and the current protocol is flawed for having let 
>them into the control channel.

I am 100% in the agreement with you on this. IMHO, We need SIP 3.0 . 
SIP Providers need to change the business models which were adopted 
from PSTN.

Thx
Samir

>
>--
>Dean
>


_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sip at ietf.org for new developments of core SIP